We should all agree that Harris is not the most electable out of all the Democrats who could've been the presidential nominee.

We should all agree that Harris is not the most electable out of all the Democrats who could've been the presidential nominee. I respectfully disagree. VP Harris is one of the few Democrats who have the name recognition that was needed to step up to replace Biden. She was also the natural replacement, given her status as VP. If we nominated some Governor or Senator, they would have to expand their name recognition nationally, which they might not have enough time and money to do when we're pretty close to November. She also doesn't have the old age issue that Biden had and unlike some of the other replacements who had the name recognition to stand up (such as Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton).

There is indeed only one Andy Beshear, and if Harris loses I will be all aboard that bandwagon for 2028.

She was the most liberal member of the Senate according to voteview.com

I still won't praise what Biden did, dropping out before the convention, but that was all part of the plan. He should've announced last year that he wouldn't seek re-election. Politicians always pander to their biggest donors.

Biden could've been more honest like Polk, Buchanan and Hayes.

She was the most liberal member of the Senate according to voteview.com 1. The way Voteview analyzes ideology is stupid, purely relying on as the name suggests votes. Also dividing it as "LIBERAL V CONSERVATIVE" is dumb, and it leads to times where LEFTISTS will be listed as Further Right than people who aren't 2. THATS NOT TRUE, I was just on VoteView, Kamala is SECOND to Elizabeth Warren Look for urself https://voteview.com/congress/senate/117

Still, she was one of the most liberal members. I read that website every day, but I read the votes on legislation from all the years and I select certain members and the ideological positions they took regarding that vote. I find this website among the most useful for American history. Did you know that the liberals in Congress up until the 1930s were the racist southern Democrats ?.

Voteview is very useful. It records every vote Congress ever took along with every member who ever served and how they voted.

She was the most liberal member of the Senate according to voteview.com Being more liberal doesn't always tie to a lower chance of winning an election. It also depends on the opponent. In this case, the Republicans nominated a convicted felon who's been accused (and convicted on some) of tons of horrible stuff from sexually assaulting women to falsifying business records, whereas Harris isn't convicted (let alone accused) on any of these things. And a lot of moderates are tired of Trump and they would've only voted for him because they felt Biden was too old, whereas Harris doesn't have this issue. Not to mention Harris is basically campaigning as the female Obama. Now, if Harris is accused of even A QUARTER of what Trump is accused of, let me know.

I still won't praise what Biden did, dropping out before the convention, but that was all part of the plan. That's quite a buy in to a conspiracy theory. What evidence do you have?

Did you know that the liberals in Congress up until the 1930s were the racist southern Democrats ?. They weren't liberals. In either sense of the term (economic or social liberals). They were conservative Democrats. And the Republicans had their liberal branch AKA the Rockefeller Republicans.

Did you know that the liberals in Congress up until the 1930s were the racist southern Democrats ?. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ See THIS RIGHT HERE is why I do not think the site is reliable. Do you hear yourself? And you are going to claim that WE are the ones who buy everything we are told? "the LIBERALS were the Racist Southern Dems" that could not be ANY FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH He basically just puts the parties on a spectrum based purely on Partisan positions rather than ideological ones, which makes it so that people like Robert La Follette, who literally openly called for the nationalization of the Railroad Industry and praised the Russian Revolution as a CENTRIST. Same too goes to the Socialist Parties two congressman, u honestly going to claim THEY ARE CENTRISTS?

They weren't liberals. In either sense of the term (economic or social liberals). They were conservative Democrats. And the Republicans had their liberal branch AKA the Rockefeller Republicans. When the site is labelling a literal Klansman (Hugo Black) further left than a Self Described "DEBSIAN SOCIALIST" (Homer Bone), while both are further Left than a Literal Fascist (Robert Rice Reynolds), who is labelled as to the left of a Progressive Republican (Hiram Johnson)....the site is just garbage

Harris is still someone to be concerned about, her ties to Big Tech would help Google wiggle out of a meaningful breakup. She wants to use the federal government to censor Americans online, she wants to make life more expensive and miserable for the average American, she's an elitist. She's a corporate sellout.

Harris is still someone to be concerned about, her ties to Big Tech would help Google wiggle out of a meaningful breakup. She wants to use the federal government to censor Americans online, she wants to make life more expensive and miserable for the average American, she's an elitist. She's a corporate sellout. My political views are neutral 🤔

I agree with where voteview places these politicians on the ideological breakdown. Who am I to call this website trash ?.

Harris is still someone to be concerned about, her ties to Big Tech would help Google wiggle out of a meaningful breakup. She wants to use the federal government to censor Americans online, she wants to make life more expensive and miserable for the average American, she's an elitist. She's a corporate sellout. An lemme guess, ur going to somehow claim that Trump isn't any of those things? The fact that there is so much fearmongering over fucking BIDEN AND KAMALA AND WALZ is proof Conservatives are fucking weak AS FUCK! These are literally the most milquetoast boring Dems I have ever seen in my life and THESE are ur boogeymen?

her ties to Big Tech would help Google wiggle out of a meaningful breakup. She hasn't said this, and the Biden/Harris administration is the reason that breakup is even on the table as it is the first one to meaningfully pursue strong anti-trust regulation in decades. Republicans have been ideologically opposed to anti trust actions forever. (Well, since Teddy Roosevelt, but he was an odd Republican and ended up not being a Republican.) She wants to use the federal government to censor Americans online, Have you not heard Donald Trump saying all the liberal things he wants to censor when he gets in office? Are you ignorant of the stringent censorship that Ron DeSantis is implementing in Florida? she wants to make life more expensive and miserable for the average American, Do you know how expensive things are going to get with Trump's proposed tariffs? Do you know how expensive food is going to get with his deportation of most of the people in this country willing to cheaply harvest the domestic food and the tariffs on imported food? She's a corporate sellout. Trump is willing to sell out anyone and anything if it profits him. He went from being the one originally proposing to ban TikTok (see censorship) to being anti TikTok ban because a person who was a big investor in TikTok donated a lot of money to him. He's proposing ADDITIONAL giant tax cuts for corporations and the rich. Are you kidding me?

I'm not neutral. I'm just not keen on certain political issues because I don't have enough knowledge.

I'm not neutral. I'm just not keen on certain political issues because I don't have enough knowledge. 1st smart thing u said all day. Maybe people who don't know things shoul:d shut up, learn, and then try to have a discussion

I am somebody who can get along with people regardless of their political beliefs.

A political party can't stay in power forever, each of the two parties has their turn in power.

Stein leads Harris among Muslims in MI, AZ, and WI. And Trump leads Harris in MI among Muslim. https://x.com/nypost/status/1833185836214423557

No actualy data in that article about that poll. What's the sample size/MoE?