|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
US President - D Primaries
|
Parents |
> United States > U.S. Executive > Popular Vote
|
Office | President |
Honorific | President - Abbr: President |
Type | Democratic Primary Election |
Filing Deadline | January 01, 2020 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Open | February 03, 2020 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Close | August 11, 2020 - 12:00pm Central |
Term Start | January 20, 2021 - 12:00pm |
Term End | January 20, 2025 - 12:00pm |
Contributor | M@ |
Last Modified | E Pluribus Unum July 24, 2022 09:23pm |
Data Sources | [Link] |
Description |
Candidates who withdrew before the Iowa Caucuses while qualifying for at least one primary ballot:
Joe Sestak (December 1st, on the ballot in NH/AR/MI/CA/FL)
Steve Bullock (December 2nd, on the ballot in NH/AR)
Kamala Harris (December 3rd, on the ballot in NH/AR/TN)
Julian Castro (January 2nd, on the ballot in 19 states)
Marianne Williamson (January 10th, on the ballot in 22 states)
Cory Booker (January 13th, on the ballot in 26 states)
John Delaney (January 31st, on the ballot in 27 states)
Candidates who dropped out after Iowa:
Andrew Yang (February 11th)
Michael Bennet (February 11th)
Deval Patrick (February 12th)
Tom Steyer (February 29th)
Pete Buttigieg (March 1st)
Amy Klobuchar (March 2nd)
Mike Bloomberg (March 4th)
Elizabeth Warren (March 5th)
Tulsi Gabbard (March 19th)
Bernie Sanders (April 8th)
|
|
|
![](../images/spacer.gif) | DROPPED OUT - NO VOTES |
![](../images/spacer.gif) |
|
Wayne M. Messam (D)
Mar 13, 2019 -
Nov 20, 2019
|
Brian P. Moore (D)
Nov 07, 2019 -
Nov 13, 2019
|
Michael E. Arth (D)
Nov 09, 2018 -
Nov 04, 2019
|
Beto O'Rourke (D)
Mar 14, 2019 -
Nov 01, 2019
|
Tim Ryan (D)
Apr 04, 2019 -
Oct 24, 2019
|
Bill de Blasio (D)
May 16, 2019 -
Sep 20, 2019
|
Kirsten Gillibrand (D)
Jan 15, 2019 -
Aug 28, 2019
|
Seth Moulton (D)
Apr 22, 2019 -
Aug 23, 2019
|
Jay Inslee (D)
Jan 02, 2019 -
Aug 21, 2019
|
John Hickenlooper (D)
Mar 04, 2019 -
Aug 15, 2019
|
Stacey Abrams (D)
Aug 13, 2019
|
Mike Gravel (D)
Mar 19, 2019 -
Aug 01, 2019
|
Ami Horowitz (D)
May 02, 2019 -
Jul 31, 2019
|
Eric M. Swalwell (D)
Apr 08, 2019 -
Jul 08, 2019
|
Joe Sanberg (D)
Jun 01, 2019
|
Terry McAuliffe (D)
Apr 17, 2019
|
Ryan Farber (D)
Feb 28, 2018 -
Apr 04, 2019
|
Sherrod Brown (D)
Mar 07, 2019
|
Jeff Merkley (D)
Mar 05, 2019
|
Eric Holder (D)
Mar 04, 2019
|
Mitchell J. "Mitch" Landrieu (D)
Feb 06, 2019
|
Adam Schiff (D)
Feb 04, 2019
|
Eric Garcetti (D)
Jan 29, 2019
|
Richard Ojeda II (D)
Nov 11, 2018 -
Jan 25, 2019
|
Chris Murphy (D)
Jan 23, 2019
|
Bob Casey Jr. (D)
Jan 18, 2019
|
Martin J. O'Malley (D)
Jan 03, 2019
|
Mark Zuckerberg (D)
00, 2019
|
John F. Kerry (D)
Dec 07, 2018
|
Michael Avenatti (D)
Dec 04, 2018
|
Patrick Little (D)
Aug 08, 2018 -
Nov 13, 2018
|
Roque "Rocky" De La Fuente (D)
Jan 09, 2017 -
Oct 01, 2018
|
Jason Kander (D)
Jun 25, 2018
|
Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson (D)
Apr 00, 2018
|
Roy Cooper (D)
Mar 29, 2018
|
Luis V. Gutierrez (D)
Mar 00, 2018
|
Oprah Winfrey (D)
Feb 22, 2018
|
Andrew Cuomo (D)
00, 2018
|
William McRaven (D)
00, 2018
|
Howard Schultz (D)
00, 2018
|
Nina Turner (D)
00, 2018
|
Al Franken (D)
Dec 00, 2017
|
Joseph P. Kennedy, III (D)
Jul 18, 2017
|
Hillary Clinton (D)
Apr 00, 2017
|
Tim Kaine (D)
Nov 17, 2016
|
Gavin Newsom (D)
00, 2016
|
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
Jun 26, 2019 06:00pm |
Jun 27, 2019 09:00pm |
Debate |
First 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Jul 30, 2019 07:00pm |
Jul 31, 2019 10:00pm |
Debate |
Second 2020 Democratic Presidental Primary Debate
|
RP |
Sep 04, 2019 06:00pm |
Sep 04, 2019 09:00pm |
Town Hall |
Democratic Primary Climate Town Hall
|
RP |
Sep 12, 2019 08:00pm |
Sep 12, 2019 10:00pm |
General Election |
Third 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Oct 10, 2019 08:00pm |
Oct 10, 2019 10:00pm |
Town Hall |
Democratic Primary LGBTQ Town Hall
|
RP |
Oct 15, 2019 07:00pm |
Oct 15, 2019 10:00pm |
Debate |
Fourth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Nov 20, 2019 07:00pm |
Nov 20, 2019 09:00pm |
Debate |
Fifth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Dec 07, 2019 07:00pm |
Dec 07, 2019 10:00pm |
Interview |
Teamsters Presidential Forum
|
RP |
Dec 19, 2019 07:00pm |
Dec 19, 2019 09:00pm |
Debate |
Sixth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Jan 14, 2020 07:00pm |
Jan 14, 2020 10:00pm |
Debate |
Seventh 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Feb 07, 2020 07:00pm |
Feb 07, 2020 10:00pm |
Debate |
Eighth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Feb 19, 2020 07:00pm |
Feb 19, 2020 10:00pm |
Debate |
Ninth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Feb 25, 2020 07:00pm |
Feb 25, 2020 10:00pm |
Debate |
Tenth 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
Mar 15, 2020 07:00pm |
Mar 15, 2020 09:00pm |
Debate |
Eleventh 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debate
|
RP |
![](../images/spacer.gif) | VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS |
![](../images/ButtonAdd.gif) |
|
|
Start Date |
Candidate |
Category |
Ad Tone |
Lng |
Title |
Run Time |
Contributor |
|
![](../images/spacer.gif) | BOOKS |
![](../images/ButtonAdd.gif) |
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
![](../images/spacer.gif) | INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
DISCUSSION |
[View All 706 Previous Messages] |
|
D:9642 | EastTexasDem ( 1194.2181 points)
![](images/emote1.gif) x2
|
Fri, October 11, 2019 05:38:31 AM UTC0:00
|
I wouldn't consider a 78 year old man having a heart attack a "non-severe medical issue."Even he admitted that he'll be taking it easier for the rest of the campaign.
Obviously I have my biases, but his polling has been stagnant for awhile now, and the fact that he had the health scare and is slowing down his campaign doesn't help his prospects of winning. I'm not surprised that progressive voters would be looking for other options, especially when Warren gaining momentum as a very progressive candidate.
I wouldn't consider a 78 year old man having a heart attack a "non-severe medical issue."Even he admitted that he'll be taking it easier for the rest of the campaign.
Obviously I have my biases, but his polling has been stagnant for awhile now, and the fact that he had the health scare and is slowing down his campaign doesn't help his prospects of winning. I'm not surprised that progressive voters would be looking for other options, especially when Warren gaining momentum as a very progressive candidate.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Fri, October 11, 2019 01:11:49 PM UTC0:00
|
I wouldn't consider a 78 year old man having a heart attack a "non-severe medical issue."Even he admitted that he'll be taking it easier for the rest of the campaign.
Obviously I have my biases, but his polling has been stagnant for awhile now, and the fact that he had the health scare and is slowing down his campaign doesn't help his prospects of winning. I'm not surprised that progressive voters would be looking for other options, especially when Warren gaining momentum as a very progressive candidate.
That first part isn't entirely True. I consider it non-severe because Bernie doesn't have a history of Heart Disease and from the info he explained about the situation it was a minor heart attack. And the taking it easier, true but not in the way you think. Bernie was holding 4 or 5 rallies in 2 different states each day so far and now won't be able to campaign that much. And after the health scare Bernie's had a surge of support. Nat's the only one looking for other options.
EastTexasDem: I wouldn't consider a 78 year old man having a heart attack a "non-severe medical issue."Even he admitted that he'll be taking it easier for the rest of the campaign.
Obviously I have my biases, but his polling has been stagnant for awhile now, and the fact that he had the health scare and is slowing down his campaign doesn't help his prospects of winning. I'm not surprised that progressive voters would be looking for other options, especially when Warren gaining momentum as a very progressive candidate.
That first part isn't entirely True. I consider it non-severe because Bernie doesn't have a history of Heart Disease and from the info he explained about the situation it was a minor heart attack. And the taking it easier, true but not in the way you think. Bernie was holding 4 or 5 rallies in 2 different states each day so far and now won't be able to campaign that much. And after the health scare Bernie's had a surge of support. Nat's the only one looking for other options.
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1772.5920 points)
|
Fri, October 11, 2019 03:29:12 PM UTC0:00
|
Lol, you should do press for the Bernie campaign.
Lol, you should do press for the Bernie campaign.
|
|
|
I:9775 | Natalie ( 108.7084 points)
|
Fri, October 11, 2019 09:16:52 PM UTC0:00
|
And you demote Bernie to 3rd? Why? If he and Yang just switched spots I'd get it, but how is Warren better than Bernie?
I've stated this before, but my main concern right now is stopping Biden. I am a Socialist, but I am also rather pragmatic. Warren might not be the most Left wing candidate, but she is certainly not a Centrist. I get why a lot of people have issues with her, but face it; At this point it's either four more years of the worst President of the last 100 years or four years of Bernie Lite. I'll take the person who wants to add more protections for LGBTQ+ individuals (which is the biggest issue to me) rather than the one who wants to take them away.
Going from a Democratic Socialist to a more Libertarian human centered Capitalist.
https://twitter.com/NatalieFaucett/status/1172552210195992577
In all seriousness though, there are a lot of Progressives who support Yang, at least from what I've seen. It's amazing that Tulsi has united both the Right and Left against her while Yang has united the Right and Left.
Have you listened to any of Yang's interviews? His one with Ben Shapiro, for example. While I absolutely hate Shapiro, that interview was what really got me on board with Yang. I felt like he was directly speaking to me at a point. He said something like "If someone in a rural city in Missouri was getting $1k a month, what would they do? Maybe go out and open a bakery..." I live in a rural city in Missouri and if I were getting $1k a month, I would open a bakery. Seriously. So if the Dems want a candidate who can speak to rural America in 2020, Yang is that candidate.
E Pluribus Unum: And you demote Bernie to 3rd? Why? If he and Yang just switched spots I'd get it, but how is Warren better than Bernie?
I've stated this before, but my main concern right now is stopping Biden. I am a Socialist, but I am also rather pragmatic. Warren might not be the most Left wing candidate, but she is certainly not a Centrist. I get why a lot of people have issues with her, but face it; At this point it's either four more years of the worst President of the last 100 years or four years of Bernie Lite. I'll take the person who wants to add more protections for LGBTQ+ individuals (which is the biggest issue to me) rather than the one who wants to take them away.
E Pluribus Unum: Going from a Democratic Socialist to a more Libertarian human centered Capitalist.
In all seriousness though, there are a lot of Progressives who support Yang, at least from what I've seen. It's amazing that Tulsi has united both the Right and Left against her while Yang has united the Right and Left.
Have you listened to any of Yang's interviews? His one with Ben Shapiro, for example. While I absolutely hate Shapiro, that interview was what really got me on board with Yang. I felt like he was directly speaking to me at a point. He said something like "If someone in a rural city in Missouri was getting $1k a month, what would they do? Maybe go out and open a bakery..." I live in a rural city in Missouri and if I were getting $1k a month, I would open a bakery. Seriously. So if the Dems want a candidate who can speak to rural America in 2020, Yang is that candidate.
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Fri, October 11, 2019 11:07:49 PM UTC0:00
|
Beto: $4.5 million.
Beto: $4.5 million.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Sat, October 12, 2019 12:23:42 AM UTC0:00
|
I've stated this before, but my main concern right now is stopping Biden. I am a Socialist, but I am also rather pragmatic. Warren might not be the most Left wing candidate, but she is certainly not a Centrist. I get why a lot of people have issues with her, but face it; At this point it's either four more years of the worst President of the last 100 years or four years of Bernie Lite. I'll take the person who wants to add more protections for LGBTQ+ individuals (which is the biggest issue to me) rather than the one who wants to take them away.
Cause Biden has so much support out there. His "support" in the polls isn't real support. Poll the active base and Biden's around 3rd. Biden keeps failing at the debates, the establishment is the only people actively supporting Biden. Biden's not really a threat in the grand scheme of the election. Warren not being the most Left wing candidate is an understatement. She has offered so many half measures and wavered on a lot of things throughout the campaign, there's only one Major Left-Wing option in the race.
Besides aren't you supporting Yang, why talk this much about Warren?
In all seriousness though, there are a lot of Progressives who support Yang, at least from what I've seen. It's amazing that Tulsi has united both the Right and Left against her while Yang has united the Right and Left.
Have you listened to any of Yang's interviews? His one with Ben Shapiro, for example. While I absolutely hate Shapiro, that interview was what really got me on board with Yang. I felt like he was directly speaking to me at a point. He said something like "If someone in a rural city in Missouri was getting $1k a month, what would they do? Maybe go out and open a bakery..." I live in a rural city in Missouri and if I were getting $1k a month, I would open a bakery. Seriously. So if the Dems want a candidate who can speak to rural America in 2020, Yang is that candidate.
And Bernie wouldn't? Last time Bernie lost Missouri by a very small margin, the momentum just didn't go away between elections. And I've seen his interview where he explained how his UBI plan would be the Libertarian version where not apply to people on any other social programs and anyone on them would be forced to choose that or the greater amount they'd get in social programs. Compare that to Bernies Federal Jobs Guarantee. Under his FJG, people would earn $15, the average time a day people work is 8.4 Hours, Usually from Monday to Friday (5 Days), and the average months have about 5 weeks.
8.4×5×5=$3150/month
$3150 + the money from the social programs they get to KEEP while they need it>$1000
Natalie:
I've stated this before, but my main concern right now is stopping Biden. I am a Socialist, but I am also rather pragmatic. Warren might not be the most Left wing candidate, but she is certainly not a Centrist. I get why a lot of people have issues with her, but face it; At this point it's either four more years of the worst President of the last 100 years or four years of Bernie Lite. I'll take the person who wants to add more protections for LGBTQ+ individuals (which is the biggest issue to me) rather than the one who wants to take them away.
Cause Biden has so much support out there. His "support" in the polls isn't real support. Poll the active base and Biden's around 3rd. Biden keeps failing at the debates, the establishment is the only people actively supporting Biden. Biden's not really a threat in the grand scheme of the election. Warren not being the most Left wing candidate is an understatement. She has offered so many half measures and wavered on a lot of things throughout the campaign, there's only one Major Left-Wing option in the race.
Besides aren't you supporting Yang, why talk this much about Warren?
Natalie: In all seriousness though, there are a lot of Progressives who support Yang, at least from what I've seen. It's amazing that Tulsi has united both the Right and Left against her while Yang has united the Right and Left.
Have you listened to any of Yang's interviews? His one with Ben Shapiro, for example. While I absolutely hate Shapiro, that interview was what really got me on board with Yang. I felt like he was directly speaking to me at a point. He said something like "If someone in a rural city in Missouri was getting $1k a month, what would they do? Maybe go out and open a bakery..." I live in a rural city in Missouri and if I were getting $1k a month, I would open a bakery. Seriously. So if the Dems want a candidate who can speak to rural America in 2020, Yang is that candidate.
And Bernie wouldn't? Last time Bernie lost Missouri by a very small margin, the momentum just didn't go away between elections. And I've seen his interview where he explained how his UBI plan would be the Libertarian version where not apply to people on any other social programs and anyone on them would be forced to choose that or the greater amount they'd get in social programs. Compare that to Bernies Federal Jobs Guarantee. Under his FJG, people would earn $15, the average time a day people work is 8.4 Hours, Usually from Monday to Friday (5 Days), and the average months have about 5 weeks.
8.4×5×5=$3150/month
$3150 + the money from the social programs they get to KEEP while they need it>$1000
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Tue, October 15, 2019 11:23:37 PM UTC0:00
|
Wayne Messam Q3 Fundraising: $5
Wayne Messam Q3 Fundraising: $5
|
|
|
I:6738 | IndyGeorgia ( 4113.6006 points)
![](images/emote4.gif) x2
|
Wed, October 16, 2019 01:53:28 AM UTC0:00
|
All from small donors.
All from small donors.
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Wed, October 16, 2019 02:55:31 PM UTC0:00
|
Cash on hand:
Sanders: $33.7 million
Warren: $25.7 million
Buttigieg: $23.3 million
Harris: $10.5 million
Biden: $8.9 million
Booker: $4.2 million
Castro: $672 thousand
Ryan: $158 thousand
Messam: $31 thousand
Cash on hand:
Sanders: $33.7 million
Warren: $25.7 million
Buttigieg: $23.3 million
Harris: $10.5 million
Biden: $8.9 million
Booker: $4.2 million
Castro: $672 thousand
Ryan: $158 thousand
Messam: $31 thousand
|
|
|
I:9775 | Natalie ( 108.7084 points)
|
Fri, October 18, 2019 05:06:22 PM UTC0:00
|
-
In all honesty, AOC's endorsement of Bernie is a game changer for me. I'm back on team Bernie. I honestly thought she was going to stay out of it, but this endorsement has given me a renewed hope and optimism in what I had thought lately was a dying campaign. I think he'll be regaining his lost momentum in the coming weeks
E Pluribus Unum: -
In all honesty, AOC's endorsement of Bernie is a game changer for me. I'm back on team Bernie. I honestly thought she was going to stay out of it, but this endorsement has given me a renewed hope and optimism in what I had thought lately was a dying campaign. I think he'll be regaining his lost momentum in the coming weeks
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Mon, October 21, 2019 06:21:22 PM UTC0:00
|
Castro threatens to drop out if he can't raise $800,000 in the next 10 days - https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/21/julian-castro-fundraising-2020-053246
Castro threatens to drop out if he can't raise $800,000 in the next 10 days - [Link]
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Fri, November 1, 2019 02:29:56 PM UTC0:00
|
They met Julian Castro's $800,000 ransom, so he's staying in. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/juli-n-castro-s-campaign-exceeds-800k-goal-we-re-n1075066?cid=public-rss_20191101
They met Julian Castro's $800,000 ransom, so he's staying in. [Link]
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Fri, November 1, 2019 10:34:10 PM UTC0:00
|
Whoa. Beto's out. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/01/us/politics/beto-orourke-drops-out.html
Whoa. Beto's out. [Link]
|
|
|
D:9642 | EastTexasDem ( 1194.2181 points)
|
Fri, November 1, 2019 11:20:15 PM UTC0:00
|
I still think Beto had the potential to be a great candidate. If he had announced early, made more media appearances, and kept up the momentum, he could probably still be in the race. But he waited a little late to jump in and just failed to capitalize while Buttigieg took his place as the young, dark horse candidate. It's been kinda sad to see his campaign ending early after watching his rise up close, from the Senate campaign to opening up his presidential campaign with a magazine cover story and raising around $6 million in 24 hours.
I still think Beto had the potential to be a great candidate. If he had announced early, made more media appearances, and kept up the momentum, he could probably still be in the race. But he waited a little late to jump in and just failed to capitalize while Buttigieg took his place as the young, dark horse candidate. It's been kinda sad to see his campaign ending early after watching his rise up close, from the Senate campaign to opening up his presidential campaign with a magazine cover story and raising around $6 million in 24 hours.
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Mon, November 11, 2019 11:28:57 PM UTC0:00
|
Oh dear god. Deval Patrick mulls late entry into Democratic primary https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/11/deval-patrick-democratic-primary-2020-069535
Oh dear god. Deval Patrick mulls late entry into Democratic primary [Link]
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Mon, November 11, 2019 11:34:24 PM UTC0:00
|
Oh dear god.
Deval Patrick mulls late entry into Democratic primary https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/11/deval-patrick-democratic-primary-2020-069535
The moderates are scrambling cause Biden's failing
RP: Oh dear god.
Deval Patrick mulls late entry into Democratic primary [Link]
The moderates are scrambling cause Biden's failing
|
|
|
I:1038 | WA Indy ( 1772.5920 points)
|
Mon, November 11, 2019 11:47:17 PM UTC0:00
|
Be more predictable, E.
Be more predictable, E.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Tue, November 12, 2019 12:01:53 AM UTC0:00
|
Be more predictable, E.
It's obvious, Left candidates aren't scrambling to jump in last minute
WA Indy: Be more predictable, E.
It's obvious, Left candidates aren't scrambling to jump in last minute
|
|
|
D:1 | RP ( 5508.0200 points)
|
Fri, November 15, 2019 02:46:44 PM UTC0:00
|
Ugh. The Reuters/Ipsos poll did a split sample, one with Bloomberg and one without. I added the one that includes him.
Ugh. The Reuters/Ipsos poll did a split sample, one with Bloomberg and one without. I added the one that includes him.
|
|
|
R:7114 | Kyle ( 709.1907 points)
|
Mon, November 18, 2019 07:49:25 PM UTC0:00
|
I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
|
|
|
D:7 | CA Pol Junkie ( 4953.9048 points)
|
Mon, November 18, 2019 08:33:49 PM UTC0:00
|
Biden's trajectory is still consistently downward and that will get much worse after he loses Iowa and New Hampshire badly.
Biden's trajectory is still consistently downward and that will get much worse after he loses Iowa and New Hampshire badly.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Mon, November 18, 2019 08:39:15 PM UTC0:00
|
I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
And the nomination of that northeastern moderate over more populist candidates will cost that party to lose
Kyle: I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
And the nomination of that northeastern moderate over more populist candidates will cost that party to lose
|
|
|
R:7114 | Kyle ( 709.1907 points)
|
Tue, November 19, 2019 12:06:33 AM UTC0:00
|
I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
And the nomination of that northeastern moderate over more populist candidates will cost that party to lose
Yeah, Rick Santorum would have done so much better 🙄
E Pluribus Unum: <q 7114="">I get serious Romney 2012 feels from Biden. Everyone gets their spot in the sun (Beto, Kamala, Warren, Bernie), but ultimately, the boring old northeastern moderate emerges.
And the nomination of that northeastern moderate over more populist candidates will cost that party to lose
Yeah, Rick Santorum would have done so much better 🙄
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -405.4800 points)
|
Tue, November 19, 2019 12:16:59 AM UTC0:00
|
Yeah, Rick Santorum would have done so much better 🙄
I'm more referring to Ron Paul or maybe Gary Johnson
Kyle:
Yeah, Rick Santorum would have done so much better 🙄
I'm more referring to Ron Paul or maybe Gary Johnson
|
|
|
D:8509 | DylanSH99 ( 1668.7509 points)
|
Tue, November 19, 2019 06:41:30 AM UTC0:00
|
In response to CA Pol Junkie, Biden is still favored to win in states like Virginia, Texas, North Carolina, Arizona, Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and South Carolina. Even if he loses in IA and NH, he still has a pretty good shot. There's only 193 delegates in the early states and 1,623 delegates on Super Tuesday. Way too early.
In response to CA Pol Junkie, Biden is still favored to win in states like Virginia, Texas, North Carolina, Arizona, Florida, Ohio, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, and South Carolina. Even if he loses in IA and NH, he still has a pretty good shot. There's only 193 delegates in the early states and 1,623 delegates on Super Tuesday. Way too early.
|
|
|
[View Next Page] |
|
|