https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1204217776417603584?s=20

https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1207489227501518848?s=20

She confuses me. I'll admit, there was a time I wanted to work for her. Even interviewed with her office once.

Politicians doing something with political motivation? I've never heard of such a thing!

My new favorite conspiracy is all those demanding Tulsi make the debate stage because she won 100 votes in American Samoa.

Technically she made the delegate threshold, but I prefer her to not be there because she campaigns for Bernie..

What is Gabbard's angle of staying in the race ?

What is Gabbard's angle of staying in the race ? Ego hasn't stopped her yet?

What is Gabbard's angle of staying in the race ? She doesn't just want a Fox News contributor role. She wants her own show!

wouldn't it actually be slightly worse for Sanders if Gabbard was on the stage because who would be more likely to cast a protest vote for Gabbard, soft Sanders supporters or soft Biden supporters? I mean, Gabbard really isn't getting enough votes to quantify where her votes are coming from but Sanders probably thinks there's more to gain from one on one debates.

Hold up a minute. They're allowing Gabbard to be on the debate stage ?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/06/us/politics/next-democratic-debate-biden-sanders.html

Just read the article, safe to say the DNC is telling Gabbard to get lost & go away.

Tulsi tweeted this today: >>The jury got it right—finding Rittenhouse not guilty on all charges. The fact that charges were brought before any serious investigation is evidence that the government was motivated by politics, which itself should be considered criminal. Wow. The whole situation is so sad, and this statement does nothing for either healing or justice.

There has been a tendency across the political spectrum to draw broad-strokes conclusions about the U.S. criminal justice system based on specific adjudications. Draw conclusions based on trends amongst statistically appropriate sample sizes, not specific adjudications. The weight of one, high profile verdict shouldn't be as significant as it has become. Unless Gabbard (or anyone else) sat with the jury and listened to each case-in-chief, and deliberated with the jury in applying the law as instructed by the court, they shouldn't comment on whether the jury "got it right."

She’s a grifter

She’s a grifter 100%, but also I've started wondering ... is this the lane Sinema is going for?

Republicans have had some chatter about not putting up opponents for Sinema or Manchin. I doubt if that will happen, but...

Republicans have had some chatter about not putting up opponents for Sinema or Manchin. I doubt if that will happen, but... Seems more plausible for Manchin since they've taken several runs at him with pretty decent candidates in the past, and he's closer to moving on. Most likely scenario with Sinema is that Republicans won't get a chance to run against her.

I think Sinema is trying to be more like Josh Gottheimer not Tulsi.

Scheduled to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/595145-tulsi-gabbard-to-speak-at-cpac

Someone get her a map of Europe https://twitter.com/tulsigabbard/status/1496695830715142148

You know the Baltic states are in Putin's sights if he succeeds in Ukraine.

Quite the Putin apologist speech there.

Huh, would u look at that https://www.thedailybeast.com/accused-russian-agent-elena-branson-gave-to-one-politician-tulsi-gabbard?via=twitter_page