LOL

Distracted boyfriend meme where boyfriend is Democrats, girlfriend is things Democrats care about and woman being leered at is a generic moderate.

https://twitter.com/davidljarman/status/1422729081469108225?s=21

That's a stupid comparison when u actually look into finances in this election, it's pretty damning https://twitter.com/kirk_bado/status/1422236489073713157 https://www.fec.gov/data/independent-expenditures/?data_type=processed&cycle=2022&is_notice=true&most_recent=true&candidate_office_state=OH&candidate_office_district=11%3C/div%3E That's a stupid comparison when u actually look into finances in this election, it's pretty damning https://twitter.com/kirk_bado/status/1422236489073713157 https://www.fec.gov/data/independent-expenditures/?data_type=processed&cycle=2022&is_notice=true&most_recent=true&candidate_office_state=OH&candidate_office_district=11%3C/div%3E I don’t see your point other than a proposal to limit campaign spending.

U can lol all u want. I'm not seeing any rebuttals... When you add in candidate spending, Shontel Brown was outspent more than 2:1.Over 90% of Turner's donations were from outside the district and the vast majority are unreported, due to small donor disclosure requirements. Meanwhile, we know exactly how much each outside group spent, as you proved by posting the above Twitter graphic. How is it "dark money" when we know exactly which groups spent and how much they spent? Further, this idea that Nina was swamped by outside money is truly preposterous when SHE OUTSPENT BROWN MORE THAN 2-1, using donations that were almost exclusively out of the district. It will always be something with the far-left and far-right: there is never a legitimate loss in your eyes.

Lol, ur actually gonna make the argument that Nina having more money raised by small donors is a counter to the fact that outside groups spent more money solely on ads attacking Nina than every other outside group combined... Nina's outside spending came from normal people, Shontels came from lobbyist groups

Lol, ur actually gonna make the argument that Nina having more money raised by small donors is a counter to the fact that outside groups spent more money solely on ads attacking Nina than every other outside group combined... Nina's outside spending came from normal people, Shontels came from lobbyist groups When someone is outspent 2-1, I don’t think that people are able to actually notice whether the money came from “normal people” or not. The truth is that this district voted for Biden and Clinton 2-1 over Bernie and Nina Turner is a bad fit for it. Just take the L and move on, instead of trying to act as if it is a conspiracy that pro-Israel groups opposed a virulently anti-Israel candidate.

Who said anything about a conspiracy? Literally all the things I am showing are public knowledge. It is public knowledge that DMFI spent more money on Anti-Nina ads then every other outside group combibed If I didn't kniw any better I'd suggest ur just projecting ur own antisemetism onto me since ur the only petson bringing up conspiracies about jews here...

So your explanation of “evil money” is ..?

Corporate SuperPACs, lobbyists, duh

So your explanation of “evil money” is ..? Evil money is any money that didn't support the candidate I want... Turner and her campaign knew what they were up against. She, her endorsers, allies, and online progressives had the funds to combat the "evil money." She blew her lead and lost a majority of primary voters, but we can't accept loss because that doesn't fit into our worldview that our preferred candidates will always win unless the election is rigged/stolen/whatever. Turner had the funds to compete with Brown's spending AND outside funding, she had name ID, grassroots support, a legislative record, and a lead in early polls. Turner blew it. But that's hard to accept, so instead it's "evil money" and corporatist Dems. LOL at the result, which I wasn't expecting at all, and LOL at progressive twitter excuses when they lose.

Literally ignoring the millions raised by lobbyists in the last stretch lol @ u

So? Turner still had the ability to compete.

Lobbyist money gets u further then small dollar donors. The totals are $904K spread over a whole campaign and $1.2 Million shoveled in at the last minute. Yes u CAN compete with that, but realistically it is not a winning battle given Brown is not as egregious as say Eliot Engel

This https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1422706792249925634?s=20

Looks like we getting a rematch.... https://twitter.com/metzgov/status/1442519180234813449?s=20

Still will lose.

This rematch would not be in November but in the primary.

Still will lose. Only time will tell, same was said bout Cori Bush and Marie Newman, look at them now This rematch would not be in November but in the primary. Nobody claimed it was gonna be in November?

One thing to consider is that the district will change with redistricting 2022. And Ohio is also losing one seat. Turner won the Summit County/Akron nubbin in the district. I suspect that will be cut out in redistricting as it appears the Democrats will be packed into districts. Brown may find herself not only running against Nina Turner but maybe Nancy Kaptur.

*Marcy Kaptur

They gonna Kucinich her after like 1 year