| DISCUSSION |
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | June 12, 2024 07:11am |
Bit of a bizarre map where Rulli barely lost Mahoning (part of his State Senate district) but crashed and burned in the rurals.
Another special election overperformance by the Dems, this time a pretty big one.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 15, 2024 05:13am |
The polls were spot on here.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 15, 2024 05:08am |
Pretty good victory for Alsobrooks here, she really surged in the final few weeks.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 15, 2024 05:03am |
Shocked at the margin here. Was O'Neill's campaign that bad?
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 15, 2024 05:00am |
Luzerne County Historian: I'm surprised Ficker did as well as he did, given his track record. Anti-Hogan/Pro Trump vote I guess?
Yeah, basically. There's a large contingent of Republicans that view him as a RINO and would rather nominate a no-name MAGA candidate that would lose by 30 points instead of a popular former governor that has a chance of at least making the race close.
It's a dumb mentality and it has cost Republicans numerous winnable races in battleground states (2022 being the prime example).
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 13, 2024 08:15am |
Could someone remove one of the Wexton endorsements?
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | May 10, 2024 04:05am |
BrentinCO: 1966 CA Lt. Gov Primaries.
I believe this is what you're looking for [Link]
It's available in the 1966 Statement of Vote on HathiTrust.
|
User
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | April 15, 2024 04:41am |
The Research America & Metro News polls are the same poll. If someone could remove one of them, that would be great.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | April 09, 2024 03:01pm |
Yes, it's been a reoccurring problem for a while for me.
|
Issue
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | April 05, 2024 06:16am |
Anyone know why the map isn't displaying on the 1825, 1826 and 1827 gubernatorial races despite there being county data entered for all of them?
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 29, 2024 06:01am |
RBH: sort of an interesting primary for Allred almost reaching 60% despite not really doing much of anything in South Texas.
Could just be that the D primary electorate in Texas is more white and suburban than it was in the past, which helped Allred to the detriment of the Hispanic candidates.
Looking at the total votes map for the 2012 primary for this seat helps illustrate this, as some Rio Grande counties cast about as much votes as Harris, Travis, Dallas, etc. That is not the case here.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 20, 2024 05:18am |
Jason: I mean this state did just elect J.D. Vance. There are states where being MAGA is a liability but I'm not sure Ohio is one of them.
I agree, Moreno being tied to Trump, who will likely easily carry this state in November, is a net positive. He might crash and burn in the suburbs but they don't make up much of the electorate in this state anyway. This isn't Arizona or Georgia.
The bigger problem for Rs is that Moreno is an untested candidate that never would have gone anywhere without Trump's support. Does he have some potential scandals we don't know about yet that will rear their ugly heads in the lead-up to November? Will he prove so repulsive as a candidate that not even Trump could drag him across the finish line? We'll find out soon enough, Moreno has many potential flaws as a candidate, but being a "MAGA crazy" is not one of them.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 18, 2024 05:28am |
Oh never mind, just had to clear my cache and it's working fine now. Thanks for fixing it!
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 18, 2024 05:10am |
RBH: Anyways, I think all the Pres/Gov/Sen county stuff has been switched over pre-1976. There might be some primaries not switched over.
Silver Bow still isn't displaying properly on these early gubernatorial races though. It's also not displaying properly on some of the presidential races either, i.e. the 1892, 1904, 1908 & 1920 races, along with most FDR elections.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 17, 2024 06:09am |
I guess I could just put the results from Silver Bow in the description for years where it's unavailable.
By the way, for gubernatorial elections from 1912 to 1972, Butte-Silver Bow has data entered for it and it appears on the map, unlike here; but, weirdly, it doesn't appear to be available in the map editor until 1976 despite it appearing normally on the map itself.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 16, 2024 11:29am |
Anyone know why Silver Bow County isn't displaying properly on the map despite there being data entered for it?
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 16, 2024 06:13am |
Removed Low's checkmark because Simitian has narrowly overtaken him for second place again per NYT. I wouldn't recommend giving anybody but Liccardo the checkmark until all votes are in. This is extremely close.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 13, 2024 05:24am |
Haley is at about 40% of the vote in DeKalb and Fulton per NYT. Pretty insane considering she dropped out, though maybe not considering Atlanta's animosity towards Trump. For comparison, Haley is getting 34% in Kings County, WA (78% reporting, might change) despite it being a bit bluer than Fulton.
Trump does not appear to be underperforming his statewide margin too much in Cobb, Gwinett, etc though.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 09, 2024 04:22am |
RP: In the future, it would be good to post on the page that has the problematic link and refer to the section of the page that has the problematic link.
Yeah, sorry about that. I can see how posting about the problem here caused some confusion.
So, any idea why these races aren't appearing correctly? The 1868 general election is also not appearing, in addition to the 1865 one.
|
ContainerHistory
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 08, 2024 02:45pm |
I can access all the races on this page as well, that's not the problem. I provided the link to the 1865 appointment, below "next general election" it should show the 1865 general election. But for me it shows the 1868 appointment, thereby making the 1865 general election hidden when not browsing through this specific page.
|
ContainerHistory
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 08, 2024 02:34pm |
So you're able to access the 1865 election (AND the 1865 appointment) through the link I provided in the message above? Odd, not sure why it's not working for me.
|
ContainerHistory
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 08, 2024 01:11pm |
Anyone know why some races appear to be hidden? Like, the 1865 gubernatorial election is accessible through this page but when you click on the June 13th, 1865 appointment [Link] it skips straight to the 1868 appointment and not the 1865 election like it's supposed to.
|
ContainerHistory
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 06, 2024 04:53am |
Wozniak at 9% according to NYT, 59% reporting. All due to his name of course, but still pretty good for an independent.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 06, 2024 04:36am |
According to the results on NYT, Biden is struggling a bit in the Rio Grande Valley and is losing support to the no-name Hispanic Dems running, only getting 40% to 60% in these counties. Should be an interesting deviation map when the county results are added.
|
Race
|
|
| |
| W:11230 | Arthur ( 520.61 points) | March 06, 2024 04:13am |
I guess Porter quixotically running ads promoting Eric Early didn't split the GOP vote enough for her to get a runoff slot LOL. Good riddance.
|
Race
|
|
