 D:10358 | Charlotte KAP ( 183.6672 points)
|
Wed, September 7, 2022 03:40:47 PM UTC0:00
|
This is the decision (https://www.citizensforethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/D101CV202200473-griffin.pdf) In it, starting on Page 28, the judge emphasized that never in the history in tthe applicable law, statutory or constitutional, was a criminal conviction ever required for removal under the Constitution. Your point is, therefore, moot. Happy reading!
This is the decision ([Link] In it, starting on Page 28, the judge emphasized that never in the history in tthe applicable law, statutory or constitutional, was a criminal conviction ever required for removal under the Constitution. Your point is, therefore, moot. Happy reading!
| 
