|
"A comprehensive, collaborative elections resource."
|
OH District 07
|
Parents |
> United States > Ohio > OH - District 07
|
Office | House of Representatives |
Honorific | Representative - Abbr: Rep. |
Type | General Election |
Filing Deadline | June 01, 2024 - 12:00pm Central |
Polls Open | November 05, 2024 - 05:30am Central |
Polls Close | November 05, 2024 - 06:30pm Central |
Term Start | January 03, 2025 - 12:00pm |
Term End | January 03, 2027 - 12:00pm |
Turnout |
63.48% Total Population
|
Contributor | RP |
Last Modified | ev December 02, 2024 08:35pm |
Data Sources | [Link] |
Description |
|
|
|
|
Start Date |
End Date |
Type |
Title |
Contributor |
 | VIDEO ADVERTISEMENTS |
 |
|
|
Start Date |
Candidate |
Category |
Ad Tone |
Lng |
Title |
Run Time |
Contributor |
|
 | BOOKS |
 |
|
Title |
Purchase |
Contributor |
 | INFORMATION LINKS |
|
|
|
Date |
Category |
Headline |
Article |
Contributor |
DISCUSSION |
[View All 14 Previous Messages] |
|
D:1 | RP ( 5618.8218 points)
 x2
|
Sat, October 19, 2024 04:16:25 PM UTC0:00
|
But when his platform includes "SEAL THE BORDER" and "LOWER THE DEFICIT", it's hard to see people on the Left back him unless they haven't been paying attention
Why, exactly, are those supposedly anti-left issues? "Seal the border" is fine if you have a robust legal immigration and emergency refugee program. And the Republicans were the ones to shoot down the border bill. "Lower the deficit" should be a good thing for any side. It's the center-left Democrats who actually do that while the Republican blow up the deficit whenever they can.
E Pluribus Unum: But when his platform includes "SEAL THE BORDER" and "LOWER THE DEFICIT", it's hard to see people on the Left back him unless they haven't been paying attention
Why, exactly, are those supposedly anti-left issues? "Seal the border" is fine if you have a robust legal immigration and emergency refugee program. And the Republicans were the ones to shoot down the border bill. "Lower the deficit" should be a good thing for any side. It's the center-left Democrats who actually do that while the Republican blow up the deficit whenever they can.
|
|
|
D:1989 | RBH ( 5686.1743 points)
 x2
|
Sat, October 19, 2024 11:44:08 PM UTC0:00
|
feels like Kucinich-inclined people would be talking way more than they are if Kucinich was seriously going to finish 2nd here
Kucinich isn't George Galloway, electorally, and Ohio isn't the UK in regards to voting for Kucinich no matter what label he's running with
feels like Kucinich-inclined people would be talking way more than they are if Kucinich was seriously going to finish 2nd here
Kucinich isn't George Galloway, electorally, and Ohio isn't the UK in regards to voting for Kucinich no matter what label he's running with
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -228.6384 points)
|
Sun, October 20, 2024 12:38:54 AM UTC0:00
|
Why, exactly, are those supposedly anti-left issues? "Seal the border" is fine if you have a robust legal immigration and emergency refugee program. And the Republicans were the ones to shoot down the border bill. "Lower the deficit" should be a good thing for any side. It's the center-left Democrats who actually do that while the Republican blow up the deficit whenever they can.
They are anti-left because they buy into Right-Wing Framing of Immigration and Economics that don't lead to good outcomes.
"Legal Immigrant" vs "Illegal Immigrant" are meaningless differentiations to me, and have been used to simply weed out "Undesireables" from the US Banning immigration from Non-white nations (Which have been frequently changed to suit the needs of the capitalist class) to making the process cost upwards to $10,000.
Not even acknowledging the Austerity measures that have historically been used to address the "DEFICIT"
RP: Why, exactly, are those supposedly anti-left issues? "Seal the border" is fine if you have a robust legal immigration and emergency refugee program. And the Republicans were the ones to shoot down the border bill. "Lower the deficit" should be a good thing for any side. It's the center-left Democrats who actually do that while the Republican blow up the deficit whenever they can.
They are anti-left because they buy into Right-Wing Framing of Immigration and Economics that don't lead to good outcomes.
"Legal Immigrant" vs "Illegal Immigrant" are meaningless differentiations to me, and have been used to simply weed out "Undesireables" from the US Banning immigration from Non-white nations (Which have been frequently changed to suit the needs of the capitalist class) to making the process cost upwards to $10,000.
Not even acknowledging the Austerity measures that have historically been used to address the "DEFICIT"
|
|
|
It sounds like you/the Left have bought into and capitulated to the right wing framing on these issues. Just accepting their definitions?
A big chunk of politics is defining the framing of issues. You can't just accept the redefinition or words by your opponent the then be reactionary and oppose them. Maybe that's why the left is often so bad at politics.
It sounds like you/the Left have bought into and capitulated to the right wing framing on these issues. Just accepting their definitions?
A big chunk of politics is defining the framing of issues. You can't just accept the redefinition or words by your opponent the then be reactionary and oppose them. Maybe that's why the left is often so bad at politics.
|
|
|
I:9951 | E Pluribus Unum ( -228.6384 points)
|
Sun, October 20, 2024 08:11:31 PM UTC0:00
|
It sounds like you/the Left have bought into and capitulated to the right wing framing on these issues. Just accepting their definitions?
A big chunk of politics is defining the framing of issues. You can't just accept the redefinition or words by your opponent the then be reactionary and oppose them. Maybe that's why the left is often so bad at politics.
No? I am rejecting them? You are the one capitulating because you are doing the things they want. This isn't a "REDEFINITION" this is what Conservatives have been advocating for for YEARS, you are the one trying wiggle your way into somehow advocating a SEAL OF THE BORDER will somehow also allow legal immigration...
The Naivite of a Liberal
RP: It sounds like you/the Left have bought into and capitulated to the right wing framing on these issues. Just accepting their definitions?
A big chunk of politics is defining the framing of issues. You can't just accept the redefinition or words by your opponent the then be reactionary and oppose them. Maybe that's why the left is often so bad at politics.
No? I am rejecting them? You are the one capitulating because you are doing the things they want. This isn't a "REDEFINITION" this is what Conservatives have been advocating for for YEARS, you are the one trying wiggle your way into somehow advocating a SEAL OF THE BORDER will somehow also allow legal immigration...
The Naivite of a Liberal
|
|
|
As a third party candidate, Kucinich did decently.
As a former longtime congressman for this state and candidate for president with name recognition, he did terrible.
As a third party candidate, Kucinich did decently.
As a former longtime congressman for this state and candidate for president with name recognition, he did terrible.
|
|
|
|
|