I think this feature leaves the media endorsements blank see here (under Roos): https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=174334 or the Chicago Mayor's race: https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=963353

I'm going to test this out on a race so if you see me messing with it don't think I ignored your message.

I have a question about the Anti-Endorsement Feature: I know when this was first implemented there was a warning of abuse, I just want to gauge the threshold of "Abuse", would it simply be spamming the feature to Anti-Endorse a ton of people or is it using it too much in general the issue? And/Or should users not use it at all?

It should be rare that Users use the function. I know it's difficult without hard line rules, but I want to leave it open for the occasional use. It should almost never be used in general elections by Users unless there are more than say 3 Candidates and you really are okay with all but one. Partisan primaries can have it used more, but still limit it. Absolutely do not Anti-Endorse all the Candidates you have not Endorsed. That is obvious abuse. There should always be at least one that has neither. Preferably, neither should be the majority.

I also really don't want it used in partisan primaries of parties you don't generally support to Anti-Endorse everyone except quirky candidates that won't win but you consider "less bad" than the rest. For instance, Democrats Anti-Endorsing everyone in the GOP primary except for Liz Cheney or Republicans Anti-Endorsing everyone in the Dem Primary except for RFK Jr. That's abuse. We get it.